As part of our national accreditation process, we are required to report 4 measures of program effectiveness publicly. We are proud of our success and we invite you to compare these data with other accredited programs.
Based on a sample of School of Education graduates, teachers in their first or second year of teaching completed a unit of instruction and used a matched pre- assessment and post-assessment to measure the percentage learning gain of their students.
Graduation Year |
2017 11 teachers |
2018 6 teachers |
2019 1 teacher |
2020 7 teachers |
2021 2 teachers |
2022 3 teachers |
2023 2 teachers |
P-12 student count |
187 |
95 |
21 |
233 |
46 |
67 |
38 |
P-12 student |
25.08 |
35.04 |
32.34 |
43.84 |
31.75 |
29.53 |
41.73 |
As part of a case study methodology, School of Education faculty visit early career teacher classrooms and do an abbreviated observation similar to the observation completed during student teaching. In this case data are recorded and analyzed qualitatively. To view the format of the observation and accumulated qualitative data click on the link below.
Early Career Teacher Classroom Observation
An educational research firm was hired by a consortium of Schools of Education to develop and administer a survey of employer satisfaction with newly hired teachers from Schools of Education in the State of Oregon. These surveys are conducted every two years with the employers of the alumni from the previous two years of graduating completers. Although numbers have been improving, the response rates may indicate that responses are not representative of all employers who have selected University of Portland graduates as new teachers. The survey instrument was designed to address Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) performance categories. In the table below the numbers represent the percentage of responses within each response category.
InTASC Category |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Very well |
Learner and learning |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
8.3 |
17.1 |
31.7 |
2.4 |
Content |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
5.6 |
|
5.6 |
72.2 |
|
Instructional practice |
|
4.5 |
|
4.5 |
|
9.1 |
|
13.6 |
63.6 |
4.5 |
Professional |
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
7.3 |
22.0 |
63.4 |
2.4 |
In terms of advanced program candidates, 100% met CAEP Measure 2 by continuing employment as rated by their supervisors. In addition, we conducted interviews with both completers and employers of advanced programs as an additional data point; the interview protocol that is being used for these interviews is available here. These interviews discovered satisfaction of both completers and employers in terms of capacity; see results here.
In addition, internal and external stakeholders participate in program design, evaluation, and continuous improvement processes for both initial licensure and advanced programs through our Unit Advisory Consortium (UAC). These meetings are held twice per year; a typical meeting agenda involves analyzing data, co-constructing revisions to assessments, feedback sessions, and conducting focus groups with completers.
We administer a survey of new teachers satisfaction with the preparation they received from Schools of Education at exit of the program. The survey instrument was designed to address Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) performance categories. In the table below the numbers represent the percentage of responses within each response category.
InTASC Category |
Completely Unprepared |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Very well prepared |
Learner and learning |
|
|
|
0.9 |
2.2 |
6.3 |
8.8 |
21.7 |
31.1 |
28.9 |
Content |
|
|
0.4 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
12.2 |
22.6 |
28.1 |
33.3 |
Instructional practice |
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
1.5 |
8.3 |
21.6 |
27.5 |
40.7 |
Professional |
|
|
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
1.3 |
4.9 |
15.3 |
25.7 |
50.9 |
For advanced administrator programs, candidates rate their competency, in terms of how much better their competency was at program completion using a survey aligned to the National Educational Leadership Preparation (NELP) Program Recognition Standards. In the table below the numbers represent the percentage of responses within each response category.
NELP Standard |
Completely Unprepared |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Very well prepared |
Mission, Vision, & Improvement |
|
|
|
|
|
16.7 |
33.3 |
50.0 |
|
|
Ethics and Professional Norms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7 |
33.3 |
50.0 |
|
Equity, Inclusiveness, & Cultural Responsiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.7 |
22.2 |
11.1 |
|
Learning & Instruction |
|
|
|
|
16.7 |
41.7 |
41.7 |
|
||
Community & External Leadership |
|
|
|
|
|
22.2 |
66.7 |
11.1 |
|
|
Operations & Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.4 |
55.6 |
|
|
Building Professional Capacity |
|
|
|
|
33.3 |
66.7 |
|
The majority of out-of-state teaching positions for our graduates are in Washington State, but our graduates teach in schools all over the world, which has made tracking of graduates out of state exciting but difficult—hence the range of unknown graduates. The table below shows the percentage of graduates within each employment category for each of the most recent graduating cohorts. Advanced candidates are employed when in the program.
Year |
Cohort size (n) |
|
Teaching_ |
|
Higher |
Non-education / unemployed |
Unknown |
In state |
Out of state |
Total teaching |
|||||
2019 |
77 |
59.0 |
31.1 |
90.2 |
3.3 |
1.6 |
4.9 |
2020 |
69 |
49.3 |
31.9 |
81.2 |
8.7 |
5.8 |
4.3 |
2021 |
70 |
47.1 |
44.3 |
91.4 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
2.8 |
2022 |
51 |
65.7 |
23.5 |
88.2 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
7.8 |
2023 |
80 |
38.8 |
45.0 |
83.8 |
5.0 |
2.5 |
8.8 |